MECÂNICA GRACELI GENERALIZADA - QUÂNTICA TENSORIAL DIMENSIONAL RELATIVISTA DE CAMPOS.

  MECÃNICA GRACELI GERAL - QTDRC.

equação Graceli dimensional relativista  tensorial quântica de campos  G* =  = [  /  IFF ]   G* =   /  G  /     .=   /  G  = [DR] =            .= +   +  G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,  / T] / c [    [x,t] ]  =

//////

[  /  IFF ]  = INTERAÇÕES DE FORÇAS FUNDAMENTAIS. =

Teoria	Interação	mediador	Magnitude relativa	Comportamento	Faixa
Cromodinâmica	Força nuclear forte	Glúon	1041	1/r7	1,4 × 10-15 m
Eletrodinâmica	Força eletromagnética	Fóton	1039	1/r2	infinito
Flavordinâmica	Força nuclear fraca	Bósons W e Z	1029	1/r5 até 1/r7	10-18 m
Geometrodinâmica	Força gravitacional	gráviton	10	1/r2	infinito

G* =  OPERADOR DE DIMENSÕES DE GRACELI.

DIMENSÕES DE GRACELI SÃO TODA FORMA DE TENSORES, ESTRUTURAS, ENERGIAS, ACOPLAMENTOS, , INTERAÇÕES E CAMPOS, DISTRIBUIÇÕES ELETRÔNICAS, ESTADOS FÍSICOS, ESTADOS QUÂNTICOS, ESTADOS FÍSICOS DE ENERGIAS DE GRACELI,  E OUTROS.

/

  / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

 MECÂNICA GRACELI GENERALIZADA - QUÂNTICA TENSORIAL DIMENSIONAL RELATIVISTA DE CAMPOS. EM ;

The Feynman–Kac formula, named after Richard Feynman and Mark Kac, establishes a link between parabolic partial differential equations (PDEs) and stochastic processes. In 1947, when Kac and Feynman were both Cornell faculty, Kac attended a presentation of Feynman's and remarked that the two of them were working on the same thing from different directions.^[1] The Feynman–Kac formula resulted, which proves rigorously the real-valued case of Feynman's path integrals. The complex case, which occurs when a particle's spin is included, is still an open question.^[2]

It offers a method of solving certain partial differential equations by simulating random paths of a stochastic process. Conversely, an important class of expectations of random processes can be computed by deterministic methods.

Theorem[edit source]

Consider the partial differential equation

$${\displaystyle \frac{\mathrm{\partial }�}{\mathrm{\partial }�}(�,�)+�(�,�)\frac{\mathrm{\partial }�}{\mathrm{\partial }�}(�,�)+\frac{1}{2}{�}^2(�,�)\frac{{\mathrm{\partial }}^2�}{\mathrm{\partial }{�}^2}(�,�)-�(�,�)�(�,�)+�(�,�)=0,}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

defined for all ${\displaystyle �\in \mathbb{�}}$ and ${\displaystyle �\in [0,�]}$, subject to the terminal condition

$${\displaystyle �(�,�)=�(�),}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

where ${\displaystyle �,�,�,�,�}$ are known functions, ${\displaystyle �}$ is a parameter, and ${\displaystyle �:\mathbb{�}\times [0,�]\to \mathbb{�}}$ is the unknown. Then the Feynman–Kac formula tells us that the solution can be written as a conditional expectation

${\displaystyle �(�,�)={�}^{�}\left[{\int }_{�}^{�}{�}^{-{\int }_{�}^{�}�({�}_{�},�)��}�({�}_{�},�)��+{�}^{-{\int }_{�}^{�}�({�}_{�},�)��}�({�}_{�})|{�}_{�}=�\right]}$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= under the probability measure ${\displaystyle �}$ such that ${\displaystyle �}$ is an Itô process driven by the equation

$${\displaystyle �{�}_{�}=�(�,�)��+�(�,�)�{�}_{�}^{�},}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

with ${\displaystyle {�}^{�}(�)}$ is a Wiener process (also called Brownian motion) under ${\displaystyle �}$, and the initial condition for ${\displaystyle �(�)}$ is ${\displaystyle �(�)=�}$.

Intuitive interpretation[edit source]

Suppose we have a particle moving according to the diffusion process

$${\displaystyle �{�}_{�}=�(�,�)��+�(�,�)�{�}_{�}^{�},}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

Let the particle incur "cost" at a rate of ${\displaystyle �({�}_{�},�)}$ at location ${\displaystyle {�}_{�}}$ at time ${\displaystyle �}$. Let it incur a final cost at ${\displaystyle �({�}_{�})}$.

Also, allow the particle to decay. If the particle is at location ${\displaystyle {�}_{�}}$ at time ${\displaystyle �}$, then it decays with rate ${\displaystyle �({�}_{�},�)}$. After the particle has decayed, all future cost is zero.

Then, ${\displaystyle �(�,�)}$ is the expected cost-to-go, if the particle starts at ${\displaystyle (�,{�}_{�}=�)}$.

Partial proof[edit source]

A proof that the above formula is a solution of the differential equation is long, difficult and not presented here. It is however reasonably straightforward to show that, if a solution exists, it must have the above form. The proof of that lesser result is as follows:

Let ${\displaystyle �(�,�)}$ be the solution to the above partial differential equation. Applying the product rule for Itô processes to the process

$${\displaystyle �(�)=\exp \left(-{\int }_{�}^{�}�({�}_{�},�)��\right)�({�}_{�},�)+{\int }_{�}^{�}\exp \left(-{\int }_{�}^{�}�({�}_{�},�)��\right)�({�}_{�},�)��}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= one gets:

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= Since

$${\displaystyle �\left(\exp \left(-{\int }_{�}^{�}�({�}_{�},�)��\right)\right)=-�({�}_{�},�)\exp \left(-{\int }_{�}^{�}�({�}_{�},�)��\right)��,}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

the third term is ${\displaystyle �(����)}$ and can be dropped. We also have that

$${\displaystyle �\left({\int }_{�}^{�}\exp \left(-{\int }_{�}^{�}�({�}_{�},�)��\right)�({�}_{�},�)��\right)=\exp \left(-{\int }_{�}^{�}�({�}_{�},�)��\right)�({�}_{�},�)��.}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

Applying Itô's lemma to ${\displaystyle ��({�}_{�},�)}$, it follows that

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

The first term contains, in parentheses, the above partial differential equation and is therefore zero. What remains is:

$${\displaystyle �{�}_{�}=\exp \left(-{\int }_{�}^{�}�({�}_{�},�)��\right)�(�,�)\frac{\mathrm{\partial }�}{\mathrm{\partial }�}��.}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

Integrating this equation from ${\displaystyle �}$ to ${\displaystyle �}$, one concludes that:

$${\displaystyle �(�)-�(�)={\int }_{�}^{�}\exp \left(-{\int }_{�}^{�}�({�}_{�},�)��\right)�(�,�)\frac{\mathrm{\partial }�}{\mathrm{\partial }�}��.}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

Upon taking expectations, conditioned on ${\displaystyle {�}_{�}=�}$, and observing that the right side is an Itô integral, which has expectation zero,^[3] it follows that:

$${\displaystyle �[�(�)\mid {�}_{�}=�]=�[�(�)\mid {�}_{�}=�]=�(�,�).}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

The desired result is obtained by observing that:

$${\displaystyle �[�(�)\mid {�}_{�}=�]=�\left[\exp \left(-{\int }_{�}^{�}�({�}_{�},�)��\right)�({�}_{�},�)+{\int }_{�}^{�}\exp \left(-{\int }_{�}^{�}�({�}_{�},�)��\right)�({�}_{�},�)��|{�}_{�}=�\right]}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= and finally

$${\displaystyle �(�,�)=�\left[\exp \left(-{\int }_{�}^{�}�({�}_{�},�)��\right)�({�}_{�})+{\int }_{�}^{�}\exp \left(-{\int }_{�}^{�}�({�}_{�},�)��\right)�({�}_{�},�)��|{�}_{�}=�\right]}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= Remarks[edit source]

• The proof above that a solution must have the given form is essentially that of ^[4] with modifications to account for ${\displaystyle �(�,�)}$.
• The expectation formula above is also valid for N-dimensional Itô diffusions. The corresponding partial differential equation for ${\displaystyle �:{\mathbb{�}}^{�}\times [0,�]\to \mathbb{�}}$ becomes:^[5]
  $${\displaystyle \frac{\mathrm{\partial }�}{\mathrm{\partial }�}+\sum _{�=1}^{�}{�}_{�}(�,�)\frac{\mathrm{\partial }�}{\mathrm{\partial }{�}_{�}}+\frac{1}{2}\sum _{�=1}^{�}\sum _{�=1}^{�}{�}_{��}(�,�)\frac{{\mathrm{\partial }}^2�}{\mathrm{\partial }{�}_{�}\mathrm{\partial }{�}_{�}}-�(�,�)�=�(�,�),}$$

   / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 
  where,
  $${\displaystyle {�}_{��}(�,�)=\sum _{�=1}^{�}{�}_{��}(�,�){�}_{��}(�,�),}$$

   / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 
  i.e. ${\displaystyle �=�{�}^{\mathrm{T}}}$, where ${\displaystyle {�}^{\mathrm{T}}}$ denotes the transpose of ${\displaystyle �}$.
• More succinctly, letting ${\displaystyle �}$ be the infinitesimal generator of the diffusion process,
  $${\displaystyle \frac{\mathrm{\partial }�}{\mathrm{\partial }�}+��-�(�,�)�=�(�,�),}$$

   / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 
• This expectation can then be approximated using Monte Carlo or quasi-Monte Carlo methods.
• When originally published by Kac in 1949,^[6] the Feynman–Kac formula was presented as a formula for determining the distribution of certain Wiener functionals. Suppose we wish to find the expected value of the function
  $${\displaystyle \exp \left(-{\int }_0^{�}�(�(�))��\right)}$$

   / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 
  in the case where x(τ) is some realization of a diffusion process starting at x(0) = 0. The Feynman–Kac formula says that this expectation is equivalent to the integral of a solution to a diffusion equation. Specifically, under the conditions that ${\displaystyle ��(�)\ge 0}$,
  $${\displaystyle �\left[\exp \left(-�{\int }_0^{�}�(�(�))��\right)\right]={\int }_{-\mathrm{\infty }}^{\mathrm{\infty }}�(�,�)��}$$

   / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 
  where w(x, 0) = δ(x) and
  $${\displaystyle \frac{\mathrm{\partial }�}{\mathrm{\partial }�}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{{\mathrm{\partial }}^2�}{\mathrm{\partial }{�}^2}-��(�)�.}$$

   / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

The Feynman–Kac formula can also be interpreted as a method for evaluating functional integrals of a certain form. If

$${\displaystyle �=\int �(�(0))\exp \left(-�{\int }_0^{�}�(�(�))��\right)�(�(�))��}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

where the integral is taken over all random walks, then

$${\displaystyle �=\int �(�,�)�(�)��}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

where w(x, t) is a solution to the parabolic partial differential equation

$${\displaystyle \frac{\mathrm{\partial }�}{\mathrm{\partial }�}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{{\mathrm{\partial }}^2�}{\mathrm{\partial }{�}^2}-��(�)�}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

with initial condition w(x, 0) = f(x).

Applications[edit source]

Finance[edit source]

In quantitative finance, the Feynman–Kac formula is used to efficiently calculate solutions to the Black–Scholes equation to price options on stocks^[7] and zero-coupon bond prices in affine term structure models.

For example, consider a stock price ${\displaystyle {�}_{�}}$ that follows a geometric Brownian walk:

$${\displaystyle �{�}_{�}=({�}_{�}��+{�}_{�}�{�}_{�}){�}_{�}}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

where ${\displaystyle {�}_{�}}$ is the risk-free interest rate, and ${\displaystyle {�}_{�}}$ is the volatility. Equivalently by Ito's lemma,

$${\displaystyle �\ln {�}_{�}=\left({�}_{�}-\frac{1}{2}{�}_{�}^2\right)��+{�}_{�}�{�}_{�}}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

Now consider a European option on an underlying stock that matures at time ${\displaystyle �}$ with price ${\displaystyle �}$. At maturation, it is worth ${\displaystyle ({�}_{�}-�{)}_{+}}$.

Then, the risk-neutral price of the option, at time ${\displaystyle �}$ and stock price ${\displaystyle �}$, is

$${\displaystyle �(�,�)=�\left[{�}^{-{\int }_{�}^{�}{�}_{�}��}({�}_{�}-�{)}_{+}|\ln {�}_{�}=\ln �\right]}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

Plugging in the Feynman–Kac formula, we get the Black–Scholes equation:

$${\displaystyle \{\begin{array}{l}{\mathrm{\partial }}_{�}�+��-{�}_{�}�=0\\ �(�,�)=(�-�{)}_{+}\end{array}}$$

where $�=({�}_{�}-{�}_{�}^2/2){\mathrm{\partial }}_{\ln �}+\frac{1}{2}{�}_{�}^2{\mathrm{\partial }}_{\ln �}^2={�}_{�}�{\mathrm{\partial }}_{�}+\frac{1}{2}{�}_{�}^2{�}^2{\mathrm{\partial }}_{�}^2$. / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

More generally, consider any option with fixed maturation time ${\displaystyle �}$, and whose payoff at maturation is determined fully by the stock price at maturation: ${\displaystyle �({�}_{�})}$, then the same calculation shows that its price function satisfies

$${\displaystyle \{\begin{array}{l}{\mathrm{\partial }}_{�}�+��-{�}_{�}�=0\\ �(�,�)=�(�)\end{array}}$$

 / G* =  = [          ] ω  , ,          .= 

Some other options like the American option do not have a fixed maturation time. Some options have value at maturation determined by the past stock prices. For example, the average option is an option where the payoff is not determined by the underlying price at maturity but by the average underlying price over some pre-set period of time. For those, the Feynman–Kac formula does not directly apply.